Pages

Tampilkan postingan dengan label rectal microbicide. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label rectal microbicide. Tampilkan semua postingan

Meet Michael Ighodaro: Our New Friendly Rectal Microbicide Advocate!

“I believe there should be other HIV prevention options for gay men all around the world and especially Africa and Nigeria where same sex is taboo, which has made it very difficult for most gay men and MSM to access HIV prevention services.”

Michael Ighodaro is an IRMA advocate from Abuja, Nigeria. He is a social worker and support officer for ICARE who loves football and being on the internet. At ICARE he is a Community Outreach Officer and works mainly providing care and counseling to HIV positive MSM. He is also involved with a new LGBTI organization in the Edo state of Nigeria called Mind Builders Initiative.

He first learned of IRMA at a training and meeting for MSM held by IRMA-Nigeria. He now creates trainings for MSM himself, where he educates others about rectal microbicides. He strongly believes that all African LGBTI need to stand up for IRMA because “we deserve a prevention option against HIV for us too.”

When asked how he combats the stigma associated with standing up for rectal microbicides in Nigeria, he says “It is a cross I have decided to carry, and no matter the stigma and discrimination I will still be an IRMA advocate. I am used to stigma, being an MSM and HIV positive person in a country where they see you as a cursed person because of your sexuality and see HIV as a curse.”

He believes IRMA should conduct more trainings around the world, as well as host a meeting every few years where advocates can meet to share experience, advice and challenges.

Read more Friendly Rectal Microbicide Advocate bios.



[If an item is not written by an IRMA member, it should not be construed that IRMA has taken a position on the article's content, whether in support or in opposition.]

Optimal Rectal Microbicide Design

via AIDS: Official Journal of the International AIDS Society, by Herrera, Carolinaa; Cranage, Martina; McGowan, Ian; Anton, Peter; Shattock, Robin J

Objective

Receptive anal intercourse in both men and women is associated with the highest probability for sexual acquisition of HIV infection. As part of a strategy to develop an effective rectal microbicide, we performed an ex-vivo preclinical evaluation to determine the efficacy and limitation of multiple combinations of reverse transcriptase inhibitors (RTIs).

Design

A nucleotide, PMPA (tenofovir), a nucleoside, FTC (emtricitabine), RTIs and two nonnucleoside RTIs, UC781 and TMC120 (dapivirine), were used in double, triple and quadruple combinations against a panel of CCR5-uing and CXCR4-using clade B HIV-1 isolates and against RTI-escape variants.

Methods

Indicator cells and colorectal tissue explants were used to assess antiviral activity of drug combinations.

Results

All combinations inhibited the isolates tested in a cellular model and in colorectal explants and produced, for at least one of the compounds, a change in the dose–response curve. Double and triple combinations incrementally augmented activity, even against RTI-escape mutants, whereas quadruple combinations conferred little further advantage.

Conclusion

The colorectal explant model may be used to identify the best candidate molecules and their combinations at the preclinical stage. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that combinations based on RTIs with different HIV-1 inhibitory mechanisms have potential as colorectal microbicides.


[If an item is not written by an IRMA member, it should not be construed that IRMA has taken a position on the article's content, whether in support or in opposition.]

The Pharmacokinetics of Tenofovir Following Intravaginal and Intrarectal Administration of Tenofovir Gel to Rhesus Macaques

via AAC Accepts, by Jeremy Nuttall, Angela Kashuba, Ruili Wang, Nicole White, Philip Allen, Jeffrey Roberts, and Joseph Romano

Abstract


Tenofovir gel (1%) is being developed as a microbicide for the prevention of HIV infection, and has been shown to reduce transmission to women by 39%. The gel also prevents infection in macaques when applied intravaginally or intrarectally prior to challenge with SHIV, but very little pharmacokinetic information in macaques is available to help extrapolate the data to humans, and thus inform future development activities. We have determined the pharmacokinetics of tenofovir in macaques following intravaginal and intrarectal administration of 0.2, 1 and 5% gels. Plasma and vaginal and rectal fluid samples were collected up to 24 hours after dosing, and at 24 hours post dosing biopsies were taken from the vaginal wall, cervix and rectum. Following vaginal and rectal administration, tenofovir rapidly distributed to the matrices distal to the site of administration. In all matrices, exposure increased with increasing dose, and with the 1% and 5% formulations, concentrations remained detectable in most animals 24 h after dosing. At all doses, concentrations at the dosing site were typically 1-2 logs higher than in the opposite compartment, and 4-5 logs higher than in plasma. Exposure in vaginal fluid after vaginal dosing was 58-82% lower than in rectal fluid after rectal dosing, but plasma exposure was 1-2-fold greater after vaginal dosing than after rectal dosing. These data suggest that a tenofovir-based microbicide may have the potential to protect when exposure is via vaginal or anal intercourse, regardless of whether the microbicide is applied vaginally or rectally.



[If an item is not written by an IRMA member, it should not be construed that IRMA has taken a position on the article's content, whether in support or in opposition.]

Using Conjoint Analysis to Measure the Acceptability of Rectal Microbicides Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Four South American Cities

via Pubmed.gov, by Kinsler JJ, Cunningham WE, Nureña CR, Nadjat-Haiem C, Grinsztejn B, Casapia M, Montoya-Herrera O, Sánchez J, Galea JT.

Abstract

Conjoint Analysis (CJA), a statistical market-based technique that assesses the value consumers place on product characteristics, may be used to predict acceptability of hypothetical products. Rectal Microbicides (RM)-substances that would prevent HIV infection during receptive anal intercourse-will require acceptability data from potential users in multiple settings to inform the development process by providing valuable information on desirable product characteristics and issues surrounding potential barriers to product use. This study applied CJA to explore the acceptability of eight different hypothetical RM among 128 MSM in Lima and Iquitos, Peru; Guayaquil, Ecuador; and Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Overall RM acceptability was highest in Guayaquil and lowest in Rio. Product effectiveness had the greatest impact on acceptability in all four cities, but the impact of other product characteristics varied by city. This study demonstrates that MSM from the same region but from different cities place different values on RM characteristics that could impact uptake of an actual RM. Understanding specific consumer preferences is crucial during RM product development, clinical trials and eventual product dissemination.



[If an item is not written by an IRMA member, it should not be construed that IRMA has taken a position on the article's content, whether in support or in opposition.]

First Phase 1 Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Rectal Microbicide Trial Using UC781 Gel with a Novel Index of Ex Vivo Efficacy


Objectives:

Successful control of the HIV/AIDS pandemic requires reduction of HIV-1 transmission at sexually-exposed mucosae. No prevention studies of the higher-risk rectal compartment exist. We report the first-in-field Phase 1 trial of a rectally-applied, vaginally-formulated microbicide gel with the RT-inhibitor UC781 measuring clinical and mucosal safety, acceptability and plasma drug levels. A first-in-Phase 1 assessment of preliminary pharmacodynamics was included by measuring changes in ex vivo HIV-1 suppression in rectal biopsy tissue after exposure to product in vivo.

Methods:

HIV-1 seronegative, sexually-abstinent men and women (N = 36) were randomized in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing UC781 gel at two concentrations (0.1%, 0.25%) with placebo gel (1:1:1). Baseline, single-dose exposure and a separate, 7-day at-home dosing were assessed. Safety and acceptability were primary endpoints. Changes in colorectal mucosal markers and UC781 plasma drug levels were secondary endpoints; ex vivo biopsy infectibility was an ancillary endpoint.

Results:

All 36 subjects enrolled completed the 7–14 week trial (100% retention) including 3 flexible sigmoidoscopies, each with 28 biopsies (14 at 10 cm; 14 at 30 cm). There were 81 Grade 1 adverse events (AEs) and 8 Grade 2; no Grade 3, 4 or procedure-related AEs were reported. Acceptability was high, including likelihood of future use. No changes in mucosal immunoinflammatory markers were identified. Plasma levels of UC781 were not detected. Ex vivo infection of biopsies using two titers of HIV-1BaL showed marked suppression of p24 in tissues exposed in vivo to 0.25% UC781; strong trends of suppression were seen with the lower 0.1% UC781 concentration.

Conclusions:

Single and 7-day topical rectal exposure to both concentrations of UC781 were safe with no significant AEs, high acceptability, no detected plasma drug levels and no significant mucosal changes. Ex vivo biopsy infections demonstrated marked suppression of HIV infectibility, identifying a potential early biomarker of efficacy. (Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov; #NCT00408538)

Read a more detailed description of the study here.


[If an item is not written by an IRMA member, it should not be construed that IRMA has taken a position on the article's content, whether in support or in opposition.]

2012 International Microbicides Conference (M2012) in Sydney, Australia

ASHM Australasian HIV/AIDS Conference 2011The next International Microbicides Conference will be held in Sydney, Australia from April 15-18th, 2012!

Registration
Registration is not yet open, but to submit an expression of interest, please click here. By submitting this, you will be contacted as soon as official registration opens!

Abstract Submission
The 2012 International Microbicides Conference (M2012) invites papers of high quality in the areas of HIV prevention, with a particular focus on microbicides, oral chemoprophylaxis, and their interface with other prevention strategies. The conference is interdisciplinary, and encourages the full involvement of communities and individuals affected by HIV. Abstract submissions will be reviewed by the Scientific Program Committee for content, presentation, timeliness, and current interest of the topic to M2012 participants. Abstracts are welcomed from researchers, program implementers, policy makers, advocates, and community members, and will be considered for inclusion provided they meet the guidelines below.

Please click here to view the abstract submission guidelines.  Authors should submit abstracts no later than 5pm AEST time on Thursday 17 November 2011. Click here for more information and details about uploading your abstract.

Scholarships
Scholarships are available to attend the 2012 International Microbicides Conference (M2012) in Sydney, Australia.

Scholarships will be offered in four categories that have distinct criteria:
1. Research
2. Community
3. Government Official/Public Health Policy
4. Media (Further details to come - Media scholarships will open 23 September)

Scholarship applications are due 5:00 pm AEST on Thursday 17 November 2011.  Click here for more details about scholarships and to apply.

For any other information about M2012 please go to microbicides2012.org.



[If an item is not written by an IRMA member, it should not be construed that IRMA has taken a position on the article's content, whether in support or in opposition.]

IRMA's next teleconference: Yes, Africa Needs Rectal Microbicides - 9/27

Yes, Africa Needs Rectal Microbicides
Tuesday, September 27, 2011, 10:00 EDT

(click here to determine the time in your area)

Please join IRMA and AVAC with our special guest Dr. Salim Abdool Karim (Slim.)

Slim is a clinical infectious diseases epidemiologist whose main current research interests are in microbicides and vaccines to prevent HIV infection and implementing antiretroviral therapy in resource constrained settings. He is Pro Vice- Chancellor (Research) at the University of KwaZulu-Natal in Durban, South Africa and is also Professor of Clinical Epidemiology at the Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University and Adjunct Professor of Medicine at the Weill Medical College of Cornell University. He is Director of CAPRISA - Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa.

Slim did a fantastic presentation at the Microbicides 2010 called "Does Africa Need a Rectal Microbicide" and the data he shared revealed the answer to be a resounding "YES!" He will be doing an updated version of this presentation on our call.

Additionally, IRMA's Jim Pickett will discuss Project ARM - Africa for Rectal Microbicides. Project ARM is hosting a 2-day strategy meeting at the ICASA 2011 conference in Ethiopia this December. The 40 invited participants and speakers will be working on crafting an African-specific agenda for rectal microbicide advocacy and research that ensures Africa remains on the rectal microbicide map, and that all Africans who need rectal microbicides have access to them when they become available.

Click here to RSVP. Check back here in advance of the call for presentation slides. An audio recording of the call will be made available shortly after its completion.


[If an item is not written by an IRMA member, it should not be construed that IRMA has taken a position on the article's content, whether in support or in opposition.]

Project ARM: John Shaw Memorial Scholarship Call for Application

Project ARM—Africa for Rectal Microbicides—is a long-term, sustained project which aims to develop community capacity around rectal microbicide advocacy in order to ensure broad participation in research activities and well-informed community input into the development of an African rectal microbicide agenda. The end goal is enhanced rectal microbicide advocacy in Africa as well as the planning and implementation of rectal microbicide trials on the continent. Project ARM is coordinated by International Rectal Microbicide Advocates (IRMA). First year funding for Project ARM has been secured from the United States National Institutes of Health – Office of AIDS Research and the New Venture Fund. AVAC is also partnering with IRMA on this initiative.

Project ARM evolved from discussions initiated by IRMA through its listserv, and from input received from African advocates and partners at two informal meetings held in conjunction with the Microbicides 2010 (Pittsburgh) and AIDS 2010 (Vienna) conferences. A working group was formed following the Microbicides 2010 meeting, and has guided this process ever since. There are now 60 working group members including advocates and community members, researchers, funders and policy-makers from 10 African countries, as well as a few key international partners.

In order to develop an African rectal microbicide agenda that articulates research, advocacy and community mobilisation strategies, IRMA is hosting a working meeting on 2-3 December 2011 in Addis Ababa as part of Project ARM. This invite-only meeting is taking place prior to the 16th International Conference on AIDS and STIs in Africa (ICASA, December 4–8), and is considered an official satellite session.

PLEASE NOTE: This is a working meeting—not a workshop, nor a conference.

The objectives of the December working meeting are:
  • To promote a common understanding of how rectal microbicide (RM) research and advocacy is proceeding, the potential role that African RM research and advocacy could play, and the various African contexts within which RMs would be introduced.

  • To enhance the capacity of African community advocates to participate in RM agenda-setting, research and mobilisation efforts.

  • To stimulate strategies for African community mobilization around RMs; to put RMs on the research agenda in Africa; and, to develop an African RM research agenda that is part of a global RM research agenda.


AIMS OF THE SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAMME 
  1. To strengthen research literacy and advocacy capacity amongst IRMA membership in Africa

  2. To promote and enhance the role and standing of IRMA within the microbicide community in Africa

  3. To facilitate the involvement of well-informed and active members of the African research and advocacy communities in the development of an African rectal microbicides agenda

  4. To ensure diversity in participation at the meeting, including from researchers and community members, women and men, gay men and other men who have sex with men, people living with HIV, and different regions of Africa

We are covering the travel costs of more than 30 of the 40 meeting participants—most of which are Africans—including speakers, organisers, invited guests, and key partners. This includes an additional 12 scholarships for Africans through this call for applications.

For more information, please send an email to rectalmicro@gmail.com.

[If an item is not written by an IRMA member, it should not be construed that IRMA has taken a position on the article's content, whether in support or in opposition.]

ICASA 2011: The 16th Annual International Conference on AIDS and STIs in Africa



IRMA's Project ARM is is a project with the goal of expanding African mobilization and enhancing community capacity around rectal microbicide advocacy, eventually hoping to aid the development of an African rectal microbicide agenda through community participation. IRMA and Project ARM are going to be at ICASA - the 16th annual International Conference on AIDS and STIs in Africa - this December in Ethiopia - are you?
---

Who? IRMA, Project ARM, and thousands and thousands of other advocates from all over Africa and the world. YOU too!

What? The theme for this year's conference is OWN, SCALE-UP & SUSTAIN.

Where? Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

When? 4-8 December 2011

Why? Register to impart your knowledge, experience and best practices on HIV, AIDS and STIs; call up all players to raise ownership, commitment and support; and get your voice heard in an international platform.

 [If an item is not written by an IRMA member, it should not be construed that IRMA has taken a position on the article's content, whether in support or in opposition.]

Rectal Microbicides at the IAS

There wasn't a ton of rectal microbicide coverage at the recent IAS in Rome, but here is some content from the conference on this topic.


Acceptability of potential rectal microbicide delivery mechanisms for HIV prevention
Abstract
Slides/Audio


Acceptability of microbicides and other new prevention technologies among MSM in Greater Buenos Aires, Argentina
Poster

Mobilizing MSM community in Nigeria to support rectal microbicides development (the author is Kadir Audu, head of IRMA Nigeria and Community Vice Chair on the IRMA Steering Committee.)
Abstract



[If an item is not written by an IRMA member, it should not be construed that IRMA has taken a position on the article's content, whether in support or in opposition.]

Investment in HIV Prevention Research

A report released yesterday by HIV Vaccines and Microbicides Resource Tracking Working Group at the IAS conference in Rome "found that overall investment in HIV prevention R&D had actually increased, with the modest exception of a one percent decline in vaccine R&D. The report documented a total US$1.19 billion investment in research and development (R&D) for four key HIV prevention options: preventive vaccines, microbicides, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) using antiretroviral drugs, and operations research related to medical male circumcision.":

"2010 has been a year of retrospection, a time for looking back over the 30 years since the first published report of the mysterious illness that would come to be known as AIDS. As sobering as this anniversary has been, it has also been a time for some optimism and calls to end the epidemic. These calls may not be simply wishful thinking, fueled as they have been by promising research results over the past two years in vaccines, microbicides, pre-exposure prophylaxis using antiretrovirals (PrEP), and antiretroviral treatment as prevention—results that have energized the entire HIV prevention field.

The first good news came at the end of 2009, when researchers in the RV 144 Thai vaccine trial reported that a vaccine combination had reduced risk of infection by 31 percent—the first clinical evidence that a preventive AIDS vaccine would be possible. Then, in July 2010, the CAPRISA 004 trial team announced its findings–that use of 1% tenofovir (TDF, also known as Viread®) vaginal gel reduced women’s risk of HIV infection by 39 percent—providing the first proof that a microbicide would be possible. This news was followed in November 2010 by the announcement from the iPrEx trial team that daily oral tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC, also known as Truvada®) had reduced risk of HIV infection by an estimated 44 percent overall in men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women, and proved for the first time that HIV prevention using PrEP would be possible. And finally, in early 2011, the HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) 052 trial established that use of antiretroviral therapy (ART) by HIV-positive individuals reduced transmission to their partners"

Source: HIV Vaccines and Microbicides Resource Tracking Working Group

[If an item is not written by an IRMA member, it should not be construed that IRMA has taken a position on the article's content, whether in support or in opposition.]

Microbicide Trials Network Statement On The Partners PrEP Study And The CDC's TDF2 Study: VOICE Study Will Continue

Via Medical News Today.

Researchers from two major HIV prevention trials announced favorable results of an approach called oral pre-exposure prophylaxis, or PrEP. One of these trials, the Partners PrEP Study, has provided the strongest evidence yet of PrEP's effectiveness.

Information from both studies will need to be fully evaluated before it can be determined what impact they will have on another major trial that is ongoing. Investigators for VOICE - Vaginal and Oral Interventions to Control the Epidemic, and the study's sponsor, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), hope to complete their evaluation as soon as possible. In the meantime, the five-arm study involving more than 5,000 women in sub-Saharan Africa will continue as currently designed.

PrEP involves the use of antiretroviral (ARV) drugs commonly used in the treatment of HIV by individuals who are not infected. In the Partners PrEP Study, researchers from the University of Washington and their collaborators in Uganda and Kenya, evaluated the safety and effectiveness of daily use of two ARVs - tenofovir and Truvada®, the brand name for a tablet combining tenofovir and emtricitabine - among men and women in a discordant relationship with a partner who is HIV-positive. The study enrolled 4,758 serodiscordant couples.

There were 62 percent fewer HIV infections among participants assigned to take the ARV tenofovir daily compared to participants who took a placebo tablet, and 73 percent fewer infections among those who took Truvada. In statistical terms, the results leave little doubt they are not due to chance. However, the study was not able to say whether Truvada or tenofovir works better than the other in preventing HIV.

The results came to light during a review conducted by Partner PrEP's independent Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB) just a few days ago, on July 10. The DSMB found the results so compelling that it recommended that it stop testing in the placebo group. The research team will be making arrangements so that participants who had been randomly assigned to take a placebo tablet can instead receive one of the study's active study products. Participants in the other two groups will continue to be followed.

In the second study, a smaller trial that involved 1,200 heterosexual men and women in Botswana, researchers from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that 62.6 percent fewer HIV infections had occurred in the group of participants assigned to take Truvada than in the placebo group. The CDC team will be reporting more details about the findings of the study, known as TDF2, at the International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention in Rome next week.
 
Both sets of results bolster the findings of iPrEx, which late last year provided the first evidence that oral PrEP can help prevent HIV. iPrEx found Truvada - together with a comprehensive HIV prevention package - was safe and 44 (43.8) percent more effective than a placebo tablet for protecting against HIV in men who have sex with men. The two studies' favorable results also raise more questions about what happened with FEM-PrEP. Two months ago, researchers announced the trial would be stopping earlier than planned because an interim review of the study's progress by its data monitoring committee determined that even if the study were to continue, it would not be able to conclude whether or not Truvada is effective in its population of women. The study team is still collecting data. A final report is not expected until late this year or early 2012.

Few conclusions can be drawn from the CDC study concerning the effectiveness of Truvada specifically in women. And although Partners PrEP found tenofovir and Truvada worked well for both men and women, the study provides more information about how these drugs can protect heterosexual men from getting infected than it does about how these drugs can protect women from getting infected from a partner with HIV. That's because in most of the 4,758 couples enrolled (62 percent) it was the male who was the uninfected partner.

VOICE involves 5,029 women from Uganda, South Africa and Zimbabwe. VOICE is testing not only daily use of an ARV tablet - Truvada or tenofovir, but also a vaginal microbicide containing tenofovir in gel form. VOICE is the only trial evaluating both a tablet and a gel in the same study. This design is important for determining how each product works compared to its control (placebo gel or placebo tablet) and which approach women may prefer.
 
Read the rest here.
 
[If an item is not written by an IRMA member, it should not be construed that IRMA has taken a position on the article's content, whether in support or in opposition.]

POZ love for IRMA - The Anal Dialogues

The July/August 2011 issue of POZ Magazine belongs to IRMA and rectal microbicides. Check it out for a nice history of our work and a snapshot of the science, including important information on lubricant safety.

via POZ.com, by Trenton Straub

Excerpt:

Perhaps IRMA’s most visible work is three game-changing reports it published in conjunction with the biennial International Microbicides Conference. The first, Rectal Microbicides: Investments & Advocacy in 2006, compiled what research was being done and where—a tricky task. “A lot of researchers were concerned that if ‘anal’ or ‘rectal’ appeared in research proposals or reports, they wouldn’t get funded, so they’d scrub their papers so those words wouldn’t show up,” LeBlanc says. “Instead, they would refer to ‘topical use of products’ or other language.” And because of the dangers surrounding the subject—male-to-male sex is illegal in many countries, including 31 in sub-Saharan Africa—IRMA first had to gain researchers’ trust, proving they were not raging advocates who would alienate and antagonize. Their professionalism paid off, and the report was a hit. “It showed we were serious,” Pickett says, “and we got hundreds of new members.” 


Read the rest.

[If an item is not written by an IRMA member, it should not be construed that IRMA has taken a position on the article's content, whether in support or in opposition.]

IRMA ALC Presents on PrEP and Rectal Microbicides for Lima's Gay Community

by Steve Miralles



On May 11th, IRMA ALC (América Latina y el Caribe), based at Epicentro Gay Men’s Community Center in Lima, Peru, hosted a presentation on PrEP and rectal microbicides.

More than 15 men attended the presentation that was facilitated by IRMA-ALC leaders Steve Miralles and Jerome Galea.

The 15 community members included doctors, lawyers, psychologists and others participated in an open discussion/dialogue about these HIV prevention interventions under investigation and information was shared on the current state of the field of rectal microbicides and the inclusion of Lima in a RM study hopefully in 2012. 

Also, the results of the PrEP study (iPrEx) which took place in Lima was discussed along with the study’s results and how PrEP could change the HIV panorama.

Participants received IRMA's Spanish edition of the report “From Promise to Product” (De la Promesa al Producto: Avanzando en la Investigación y Promoción de los Microbicidas Rectales) AVAC fact sheets on iPrEx and other information and resources available in Spanish thanks to the IRMA-ALC team.

Now underway is the preparation of a radio program about rectal microbicides and iPrex to be aired in July on Epicentro's weekly program Espacio Común and an article for the next edition of Epicentro's magazine La Antena.

Visit IRMA ALC on Facebook. And check out the IRMA ALC page on the IRMA website to see some of those Spanish resources.
Also available in Spanish are IRMA's documents on lube safety:
Safety of lubricants for rectal use: A fact sheet for HIV educators and advocates

Safety of lubricants for rectal use: Questions & Answers for HIV educators and advocates

[If an item is not written by an IRMA member, it should not be construed that IRMA has taken a position on the article's content, whether in support or in opposition.]

Slide Presentations from MTN's 2011 Annual Meeting


The 2011 Annual Meeting of the Microbicide Trials Network was held in Washington, DC this past March.

Very informative plenary presentations occurred on the two main days of the meeting. The MTN and all the presenters have graciously provided access to their slide sets. Below are links to each of them. Please take advantage of this great set of resources.

Presentations from Plenary Sessions on Monday, March 28, 2011
















Presentations from Plenary Sessions on Tuesday, March 29, 2011
















[If an item is not written by an IRMA member, it should not be construed that IRMA has taken a position on the article's content, whether in support or in opposition.]

Arming Africa with rectal microbicides: IRMA's Project ARM

 via Science Speaks, by IRMA chair Jim Pickett

About a decade behind vaginal microbicide development, the rectal microbicide field has completed two small Phase I safety trials and is currently conducting a third Phase I trial testing a rectal formulation of tenofovir gel. On the heels of the groundbreaking results from the South African CAPRISA 004 microbicide trial that showed a tenofovir-based gel could provide protection against HIV when applied vaginally, it is critical for the entire field – community members, advocates, scientists and policy makers – to prepare for advanced-stage effectiveness trials of rectal microbicides. In fact, the National Institutes of Health-funded Microbicide Trials Network is currently developing a protocol (MTN 017) for a Phase II rectal microbicide safety trial that would take place at sites in Thailand, South Africa, Peru and the United States, with a launch date sometime in 2012.

Africa needs more of our attention in terms of rectal microbicide advocacy. While IRMA has hundreds of active African members across the continent, until recently rectal microbicides have simply not been part of the larger HIV prevention discussion in Africa. This is partly due to the denial of anal sex among heterosexual men and women and the pervasive homophobia that has denied and criminalized the very existence of gay men and other men who have sex with men (MSM). It had long been incorrectly assumed that the primary (read: only one that matters) means of HIV transmission on the continent was through unprotected vaginal intercourse. The truth is much more complex than that – unprotected anal intercourse DOES play a role in the African epidemic – a significant percentage of heterosexual Africans most certainly engage in anal intercourse, and gay men and other MSM exist in every country, and in most, bear a much higher HIV burden when compared to the general population.

Read the whole thing.


[If an item is not written by an IRMA member, it should not be construed that IRMA has taken a position on the article's content, whether in support or in opposition.]

CROI 2011: Rectal Microbicides to Prevent HIV Infection in Heterosexual Populations in High-prevalence Settings

Poster from CROI 2011

Dobromir Dimitrov*1, M-C Boily2, S Abdool Karim3, and B Mâsse1,4
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Res Ctr, Seattle, WA, US; 2Imperial Coll London, UK; 3Univ of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa; and 4Univ of Montreal, Canada


Background:
The role of anal intercourse in the overall heterosexual HIV epidemic remains unclear. However, it may be an important risk factor because the considerably higher risk of HIV infection during unprotected receptive anal intercourse compared to vaginal intercourse. Anal intercourse is widely practiced by heterosexuals in many countries; in Tanzania, 6% of sexually active school pupils reported anal intercourse at their first sexual experience. In Cape Town, 10 to 14% of the study participants reported engaging in anal intercourse over the last 3 months. Different mathematical modeling studies have assessed the potential impact of a vaginal microbicide in heterosexual populations and of a rectal microbicide for homosexuals. However, none have assessed the potential impact of a rectal microbicide in heterosexual population. Our study aims to compare the potential impact of rectal, vaginal, and bi-compartment (i.e. applied vaginally and protective during vaginal and anal intercourse) microbicides to prevent HIV acquisition and transmission in heterosexual populations.

Methods:
Risk equations were used to determine under which conditions a rectal microbicide could be as useful as a vaginal microbicide. A transmission dynamic model was used to assess the population-level impact of the different microbicides in a variety of intervention scenarios and high HIV prevalence settings and to predict the fractions of new HIV infections prevented over fixed time periods.

Results:
Without anal intercourse, a 50% efficacious vaginal microbicide used by 100% of females prevents about 10% and 25% of all new male and female HIV infections over 10 years if adherence is 30% and 75%, respectively. These 10-year infection preventions are reduced by 32% in populations with 10% frequency of receptive anal intercourse, assuming 4-fold increase in transmission risk per receptive anal intercourse (RRRAI). A rectal microbicide could be as effective as a vaginal microbicide in populations with anal intercourse rates ranging from 5% to 20% across a range on RRRAI, assuming similar efficacy and frequency of use of both products. A rectal microbicide has less impact than a vaginal microbicide in populations with <5% anal intercourse, unless it is used more often or is more efficacious than a vaginal microbicide. The 10-year infections prevented of bi-compartment microbicide is 2-fold larger than vaginal microbicide in populations with 10% anal intercourse if RRRAI = 10- and ~6-fold larger than rectal microbicide, in populations with 5% anal intercourse if RRRAI = 4.

Conclusions:
Both rectal microbicide and bi-compartmental microbicide are necessary prevention tools for heterosexual populations engaging, relatively frequently (~10% of sex acts), in anal intercourse.


[If an item is not written by an IRMA member, it should not be construed that IRMA has taken a position on the article's content, whether in support or in opposition.]

Forecasters agree PrEP/microbicides could cut HIV infections in South Africa

via Aidsmap, by Gus Cairns

Several presentations at the Eighteenth Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections this week used mathematical modelling to forecast the impact of adopting oral pre-exposure prophlyaxis (PrEP) or a topical microbicide in a high-prevalence country, added to HIV treatment or on its own. Three used South Africa as a model, while one analysed how PrEP might affect a serodiscordant couple.

Read the rest.


[If an item is not written by an IRMA member, it should not be construed that IRMA has taken a position on the article's content, whether in support or in opposition.]

Pittsburgh's Dynamic Rectal Duo

IRMA Scientific Vice Chair Ian McGowan and his research/life partner, Ross Cranston (also a member of the IRMA Steering Committee) are featured in CUE Pittsburgh this month. They talk about our favorite topic - rectal microbicides - and a trial taking place right in Pittsburgh that gay men can get involved in.

The article, below, starts on Page 17. Use the arrows on both sides of the magazine to "flip" pages forward and back.






[If an item is not written by an IRMA member, it should not be construed that IRMA has taken a position on the article's content, whether in support or in opposition.]

PRESS RELEASE: Researchers Reformulate Tenofovir Vaginal Gel for Rectal Use

via Microbicide Trials Network

[The abstract, Tenofovir Gel Reformulation Results in Improved Product Safety for Rectal Application, was presented at a poster session from 2-4 p.m., Monday, Feb. 28. The results of RMP-02/MTN-006 were discussed at a CROI press conference from 7:30-8:30 a.m., Monday, Feb. 28]

‘New’ gel safe in laboratory studies




BOSTON, Feb. 28, 2011 – A change in the formulation of tenofovir gel, an anti-HIV gel developed for vaginal use, may make it safer to use in the rectum, suggests research presented today at the 18th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI). In laboratory tests of rectal tissue, researchers from the Microbicide Trials Network (MTN) found the reformulated gel was less harmful to the lining of the rectum than the original vaginal formulation, and just as effective in protecting cells against HIV.

Researchers are now testing the reformulated gel in an early-phase clinical trial with men and women. Results from these and future studies will have important implications for the development of a rectal microbicide that could help protect against HIV or other sexually transmitted infections during anal sex.

Tenofovir gel has shown significant promise in reducing HIV risk in women through vaginal sex. But because the rectal epithelium – the lining of the rectum that serves as the first line of defense against HIV – is much thinner than the vaginal lining, the gel may not be safe or effective to use rectally. By its nature, tenofovir gel is hyperosmolar – contains a higher concentration of sugars and salts relative to cells. This quality could have a harmful effect on the rectal lining by causing epithelial cells to shrink as they purge water to achieve balance. Weakened in this manner, the rectal epithelium may be less able to protect against HIV.

To make tenofovir gel safe and more amenable to rectal use, researchers from CONRAD, a research organization which holds the rights to develop the gel, reformulated it with a reduced amount of glycerin, a common additive found in many gel-like products. In laboratory tests conducted by MTN researchers, the reformulated gel was three times less likely to cause cells in rectal tissue to release water, and equally effective against HIV as the vaginal formulation.

“The lining of the rectum is much more fragile than the vaginal epithelium, so we can’t be certain a product like tenofovir gel that is safe for vaginal use will be completely safe to use in the rectum,” said Charlene Dezzutti, Ph.D., associate professor of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive sciences at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and principal investigator of the MTN Network Laboratory. “We are very encouraged by our laboratory data that suggest the reformulated gel could be safer for rectal use. These results provide an important bridge to clinical studies, and we have already begun testing it with men and women.”

The new formulation of tenofovir gel is being tested for safety and acceptability in a clinical trial called MTN-007, currently underway at three MTN-affiliated sites at the University of Pittsburgh,

RMP-02/MTN-006, the first-ever clinical study to test the safety of vaginal tenofovir gel in the rectum. These results, which were also presented at CROI, found the gel significantly inhibited HIV in tissue samples, but that men and women in the study did not particularly like it and some experienced uncomfortable gastrointestinal side effects. Researchers are hopeful the reformulated gel now being tested in MTN-007 will address these concerns.

In addition to Dr. Dezzutti, other authors of the study are Lisa Rohan, Ph.D., University of Pittsburgh; J.D. Lynam, Magee-Womens Research Institute; Lin Wang, M.D., Ph.D., Magee-Womens Research Institute; and David Friend, Ph.D., CONRAD, Arlington, Va.

Tenofovir gel contains the antiretroviral tenofovir, which is commonly used in the treatment of HIV. Both the oral and vaginal formulations of tenofovir were developed by Gilead Sciences, Inc., of Foster City, Calif. In 2006, Gilead Sciences assigned the rights for tenofovir gel to the International Partnership for Microbicides of Silver Spring, Md., and CONRAD, of Arlington, Va.

The study was conducted through the MTN, which is funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Division of AIDS with co-funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

# # #

The abstract, Tenofovir Gel Reformulation Results in Improved Product Safety for Rectal Application, was presented at a poster session from 2-4 p.m., Monday, Feb. 28. The results of RMP-02/MTN-006 were discussed at a CROI press conference from 7:30-8:30 a.m., Monday, Feb. 28.

About the Microbicide Trials Network

The Microbicide Trials Network (MTN) is an HIV/AIDS clinical trials network established in 2006 by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases with co-funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the National Institute of Mental Health, all components of the U.S. National Institutes of Health. Based at Magee-Womens Research Institute and the University of Pittsburgh, the MTN brings together international investigators and community and industry partners who are devoted to preventing or reducing the sexual transmission of HIV through the development and evaluation of products applied topically to mucosal surfaces or administered orally.


[If an item is not written by an IRMA member, it should not be construed that IRMA has taken a position on the article's content, whether in support or in opposition.]